Why Multitasking Is Bad for Us — Full Attention Wins Every Time
- Jo Moore
- Feb 14
- 6 min read
“Attention is the rarest and purest form of generosity.” — Simone Weil
We like to brag about our ability to multitask. We check email during meetings, scroll while we talk, and juggle five tabs, three apps, and a half-finished project at once. It feels productive. It feels modern. It feels necessary.
The science says otherwise.
Multitasking doesn’t make you more efficient — it fragments your mind, slows you down, increases errors, stresses your nervous system, and erodes the depth of your thinking. By contrast, giving your full attention to one thing at a time produces higher quality work, deeper learning, better relationships, and a calmer, clearer mind. Below I explain why, with quotes and studies that back up the claims.
The central lie: “I can do two (or three) things at once”
The first truth to accept is simple: humans don’t truly perform two attention-demanding tasks simultaneously. What we call “multitasking” is nearly always task switching — a rapid toggling of attention between tasks. Each switch costs time, clarity, and mental energy.
Cognitive science has measured this repeatedly: when you switch tasks, your response times increase and your error rates go up. This “switch cost” persists even when you expect it and prepare for it. In short, switching attention is costly. (PubMed)
“The ability to concentrate and to use time well is everything.” — Lee Iacocca
Multitasking reduces cognitive control and memory
One of the landmark studies on media multitasking (Ophir, Nass, & Wagner, 2009) compared heavy media multitaskers to light ones and found that heavier multitaskers performed worse on measures of attention and cognitive control. Those who regularly juggled many streams of media were more distractible and had more trouble filtering irrelevant information. The implication is clear: constant multitasking reshapes how the brain manages focus. (PNAS)
Follow-up and related work has strengthened that picture. Research examining media multitasking and memory has shown that heavy multitaskers have poorer working memory and long-term memory performance — which means less ability to hold and use relevant information while learning or problem-solving. Persistent multitasking appears to widen attention in unhelpful ways, letting distraction push out important details. (PubMed)
Multitasking steals time — and adds stress
You might think switching between tasks saves time. Data suggest the opposite. Interruptions lead to chains of distraction; people often try to “catch up” by working faster, which increases stress and frustration. Studies of workplace interruptions found that after an interruption it can take substantial time to reorient to the primary task — widely reported as roughly 20–25 minutes on average to fully resume deep focus — and that workers compensate by rushing, with higher reported stress and time pressure. Even when total task time appears unchanged, the subjective cost and lowered cognitive quality are real. (ics.uci.edu)
A 2008 study from UC-Irvine quantified what many of us intuit: interruptions aren’t neutral. They fragment the workday and reduce the capacity for sustained attention, leading people to feel more pressured and less satisfied even when they “get things done.” (ics.uci.edu)
“What we pay attention to determines what we see.” — Jon Kabat-Zinn
Multitasking reduces the quality of thinking and creativity
Deep thinking — synthesis, insight, creativity — requires continuous unbroken attention. When we flit between tasks, we rarely enter the deeper cognitive states where novel connections form. Creativity benefits from sustained, undistracted attention; when we fragment that attention, we reduce our ability to combine ideas and see patterns.
Cal Newport, in Deep Work, argues that producing at a high level requires long blocks of focused, distraction-free time. Neuroscience echoes this: the brain uses different networks for focused concentration versus wandering or shallow engagement; repeatedly fragmenting attention trains the brain toward the shallow end of cognition and away from depth. (See Newport for a practical, evidence-informed argument about depth and attention.) (PNAS)
Multitasking hurts learning and long-term retention
If you’re trying to learn — a new language, a professional skill, complex subject matter — divided attention impairs encoding and consolidation. Studies on media multitasking and student outcomes show clear ties between distraction and poorer academic performance, lower recall, and reduced comprehension. When material doesn’t make it into working memory and then into long-term memory, learning is shallow and fragile. (SpringerLink)
It increases physiological stress and cognitive load
Switching constantly raises mental workload. People report higher frustration, more effort, and greater stress under multitasking conditions. Physiological markers (like increased heart rate and skin conductance in some studies) show that multitasking isn’t just a mental inconvenience — it’s a bodily state that taxes your resources. Over time, chronic high cognitive load contributes to burnout, decreased well-being, and poorer decision making. (ics.uci.edu)
The myth of the “multitasker” — why self-assessment fails
Many people believe they are “good at multitasking.” But self-perception often misleads and so we have no idea that multitasking is bad for us. People overestimate their multitasking performance because they confuse busyness with productivity. Objective tests consistently show that people who think they multitask effectively often make more errors and perform worse on cognitive tasks than those who focus on one thing at a time. The subjective feeling of getting multiple things done masks real losses in quality and learning. (PubMed)
Four ways focused attention beats multitasking — in practice
Higher quality work.
Concentrated attention reduces errors, increases depth, and produces craftsmanship rather than fragments. Research on task switching and cognitive control shows that uninterrupted focus improves accuracy and response efficiency. (PubMed)
Faster long-term progress.
A single, undistracted hour often achieves more meaningful progress than three fragmented hours. Deep work produces durable learning and creative breakthroughs that fragmented sessions rarely match. (PNAS)
Lower stress, higher satisfaction.
When you work with focus you experience clarity and competence; when you multitask you often finish the day exhausted without the satisfaction of meaningful accomplishment. Studies of interruptions link multitasking to higher stress and lower perceived control. (ics.uci.edu)
Better relationships and presence.
Full attention is also the currency of connection. When you listen without splitting your mind, relationships deepen. Social neuroscience and relational studies show that undivided attention communicates value and fosters trust; distracted attention does the opposite. (See broader literature on social attention and connection for support.) (PNAS)
“To do two things at once is to do neither.” — Publilius Syrus
Practical ways to switch from multitasking to focused attention
Changing chronic multitasking habits takes intention. Here are proven, practical strategies:
1. Time-block your day
Work in chunks (e.g., 60–90 minutes) on a single, well-defined task. Short, deliberate breaks between blocks allow recovery without fracturing attention. Cal Newport and other productivity researchers recommend scheduling deep work blocks and protecting them from interruptions. (PNAS)
2. Eliminate external interruptions
Turn off nonessential notifications, close unneeded tabs, and silence your phone during focus blocks. Research on interruptions shows that context switching creates a chain of distractions; controlling external triggers reduces that chain. (ics.uci.edu)
3. Use “if-then” rules
Plan simple implementation intentions: “If a notification appears, then I will ignore it until my focus block ends.” This leverages evidence that pre-committed rules reduce impulsive switching. (Implementation intentions are a robust behavioural tool across many domains; see broader psychology literature for support.)
4. Practice single-task mindfulness
Spend five minutes a day fully noticing one activity (breathing, a walk, a cup of tea). Mindfulness trains attention muscles and reduces reactive switching. Even short practice improves sustained attention and reduces mind-wandering. (See mindfulness research for sustained attention benefits.)
5. Batch shallow tasks
Group email and admin tasks into one or two brief windows instead of letting them fragment deep work. Batching aligns task type with cognitive demand and prevents shallow tasks from hijacking attention.
Addressing common objections
“But I get bored — I need novelty.”Every long creative process includes boredom. Training attention strengthens your capacity to tolerate low-arousal states long enough for insight. The payoff is deeper satisfaction and true creative production.
“My job requires switching.”Some roles require responding to multiple streams. Even there, you can protect pockets of deep work and use micro-strategies (brief triage, delegation, buffer time) to reduce costly switching.
“I’ll lose responsiveness.”Boundaries increase clarity. By signaling when you’re available and when you’re focused, you actually improve the quality and timeliness of your responses — and people learn what to expect.
“Deep work is the ability to focus without distraction on a cognitively demanding task.” — Cal Newport
The wider payoff: attention is an ethic
Giving full attention is an ethical stance — toward your work, your learning, and the people you share time with. When you pay attention, you create space for excellence, for presence, and for meaningful progress. You reclaim your time (and your brain).
As Simone Weil suggested, attention is generosity. It’s a gift you give yourself and others. And in an age designed to steal it, reclaiming focus is among the most radical things you can do.
Final thoughts on why multitasking is bad for us
Multitasking is a status symbol of the distracted age, but it’s a poor trade. You give up clarity, quality, and calm for an illusion of productivity. Attention — focused, sustained, generous — is not just a technique; it’s a way of living that produces better work, better learning, richer relationships, and more peace.
So here’s a modest challenge: for the next day, honor one block of 60 minutes to deep, undistracted attention. Turn off notifications, set a timer, breathe, and do the one thing that matters most. See how different it feels.
The reward isn’t just more done — it’s more of you, present, capable, and calm.
“If your mind wanders, bring it back gently. Attention is practice.”
Comments